CIVILesbianIZATION :: Celebrate, Don’t Stigmatize, Public Sex
Public sex has a long and proud tradition and I, for one, am pleased to see that one of our Senators is engaging in it. Instead of decrying Senator Craig's actions or speculating about his sexuality or "alleged homosexuality," I think the more rational response is to affirm and celebrate public sex. The truth is people - all kinds of people including senators - engage in public sex as a part of their sexual expression and fulfillment at different times in their lives.
There's nothing wrong with public sex; in fact, it can be a positive and healthy component of adult sexuality.
Public sex, which I'd like to define as sex between two people in a public space that offers a modicum of privacy while simultaneously carrying with it the danger of discovery, is a sexual practice of all human beings. In and of itself, public sex is neither harmful nor an anathema to civil society. When heterosexual people have or think about or fetishize public sex, we giggle and culturally reify it. Think about sex on airplanes. Erica Jong made her career writing about Fear of Flying. Most recently sex in an airline restroom was featured in the film Snakes on a Plane. More than one film about heterosexual people includes a conversation about the "kinkiest" or "most daring" place that the characters have had sex. Often the responses are descriptions of public sex. Watching these films, heterosexual people may be titillated or exchange knowing glances. Public sex is a part of human sexuality and people - straight and queer - are having it.
Yet, when public sex is heterosexual we do not call for surveillance and criminalization. Snakes on a Plane did not result in federal regulations for cameras in airline restrooms. Heterosexual teenagers caught in public parks in flagrante delicto are sent home with stern warnings or, at worst, curfew violations. The wiff of two men having sex in a public restroom, however, causes public outrage and calls for monitoring, police stings and arrests. It's both homophobia and sexphobia.
Parents will counter that they don't want their children in the course of using public restrooms to encounter people having sex, particularly two men having sex. I can understand that, I don't want to unintentionally encounter two men or two women or a man and a woman having sex when I just want to urinate, but I have and it wasn't traumatic. The fact of the matter is, while people want the possibility of getting caught while having sex, they don't want to get caught. So when I walk into the restroom or a child does, most people have the capacity to pause for the few minutes it takes me to relieve myself, wash my hands, and move on with my life. Besides, if we were to extend the argument about fear of children encountering two people having sex, wouldn't we mandate that parents must not have sex if their children are in the house? After all, children are more likely to have their first glimpse of adult human sexuality running into their parents bedroom to tell them that visitors are here or they need breakfast or had a bad dream than running into a public bathroom to take a pee.
We need to speak out as a community about the homophobia and sexphobia that surrounds these public sex scandals. If it's truly OK to be gay, then it must be by extension OK for two people of the same sex to have erotic encounters in semi-public spaces that carry the possibility of being caught-and being caught must not be more likely than it is for heterosexual people and the consequences of being caught must be the same for same-sex public sex partners as for opposite-sex public sex partners.
While we're speaking out, we could also say that there is nothing particularly wrong with public sex, in fact, for some it's a perfectly acceptable expression of sexuality. Who knows- maybe in the process of speaking honestly about human sexuality we will liberate ourselves and even our heterosexual counterparts.